57 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
# Contributing
|
|
Welcome to the PyTorch Lightning community! We're building the most advanced research platform on the planet to implement the latest, best practices that the amazing PyTorch team rolls out!
|
|
|
|
## Main Core Value: One less thing to remember
|
|
Simplify the API as much as possible from the user perspective. Any additions or improvements should minimize things the user needs to remember.
|
|
|
|
For example: One benefit of the validation_step is that the user doesn't have to remember to set the model to .eval(). This avoids all sorts of subtle errors the user could make.
|
|
|
|
## Lightning Design Principles
|
|
We encourage all sorts of contributions you're interested in adding! When coding for lightning, please follow these principles.
|
|
#### No PyTorch Interference
|
|
We don't want to add any abstractions on top of pure PyTorch. This gives researchers all the control they need without having to learn yet another framework.
|
|
|
|
#### Simple Internal Code
|
|
It's useful for users to look at the code and understand very quickly what's happening. Many users won't be engineers. Thus we need to value clear, simple code over condensed ninja moves. While that's super cool, this isn't the project for that :)
|
|
|
|
#### Force User Decisions To Best Practices
|
|
There are 1,000 ways to do something. However, something eventually becomes standard practice that everyone does. Thus we pick one way of doing it and force everyone to do it this way. A good example is accumulated gradients. There are many ways to implement, we just pick one and force users to use that one. A bad forced decision would be to make users use a specific library to do something.
|
|
|
|
When something becomes a best practice, we add it to the framework. This likely looks like code in utils or in the model file that everyone keeps adding over and over again across projects. When this happens, bring that code inside the trainer and add a flag for it.
|
|
|
|
#### Simple External API
|
|
What makes sense to you may not make sense to others. Create an issue with an API change suggestion and validate that it makes sense for others. Treat code changes how you treat a startup: validate that it's a needed feature, then add if it makes sense for many people.
|
|
|
|
#### Backward-compatible API
|
|
We all hate updating our deep learning packages because we don't want to refactor a bunch of stuff. In Lightning, we make sure every change we make which could break an API is backwards compatible with good deprecation warnings.
|
|
|
|
You shouldn't be afraid to upgrade Lightning :)
|
|
|
|
#### Gain User Trust
|
|
As a researcher you can't have any part of your code going wrong. So, make thorough tests that ensure an implementation of a new trick or subbtle change is correct.
|
|
|
|
#### Interoperability
|
|
Have a favorite feature from other libraries like fast.ai or transformers? Those should just work with lightning as well. Grab your favorite model or learning rate scheduler from your favorite library and run it in Lightning.
|
|
|
|
## Contribution Types
|
|
Currently looking for help implementing new features or adding bug fixes.
|
|
|
|
A lot of good work has already been done in project mechanics (requirements.txt, setup.py, pep8, badges, ci, etc...) we're in a good state there thanks to all the early contributors (even pre-beta release)!
|
|
|
|
## Bug Fixes:
|
|
1. Submit a github issue.
|
|
2. Fix it.
|
|
3. Submit a PR!
|
|
|
|
## New Features:
|
|
1. Submit a github issue.
|
|
2. We'll agree on the feature scope.
|
|
3. Submit a PR! (with updated docs and tests 🙃).
|
|
|
|
## Coding Styleguide
|
|
1. Test the code with flake8.
|
|
2. Use f-strings.
|
|
3. run locally PEP8 fixes:
|
|
```
|
|
autopep8 -v -r --max-line-length 120 --in-place .
|
|
``` |