mirror of https://github.com/nmlgc/ReC98.git
3019c293e4
Well. The more random bullets at constrained angles are added to a bullet group, the closer that group will invariably approximate a spread shape. That's why it probably appeared as a "spread" to me in 2020. But the implementation for this group type • neither uses any of the spread code, • nor does it ensure a consistent angle between the bullets (which a hypothetical "random angle spread" group type would probably do). Also, look at its number within the enum! How could I ever get that confused?! Part of P0149, funded by Blue Bolt, Ember2528, and -Tom-. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bullet.hpp | ||
| bullet.inc | ||
| bullets[bss].asm | ||
| patnum_for_angle.asm | ||
| pellet_r.asm | ||
| pellet_r[bss].asm | ||
| template[bss].asm | ||
| tune.cpp | ||
| tune[bss].asm | ||
| types.h | ||
| types.inc | ||
| update.asm | ||
| update.cpp | ||
| update[bss].asm | ||