5 enums where code generation wants an `int`, vs. 11 cases where using
the minimum size is exactly the right default. So it's way more
idiomatic to force those 5 to 16 bits via a dummy element… except that
we can't give it a single, consistent name, because you can't redeclare
the same element in a different enum later.
Oh well, let's have this ugly naming convention instead, which makes it
totally clear that the force element not, in fact, a valid value of
that enum.
Part of P0085, funded by -Tom-.
I tried `brge` for the latter, but that had *the* most horrible
ergonomics, and I misspelled it as `bgre` 100% of the times I typed it
manually. Turns out that `dots` is also consistent with master.lib's
naming scheme, leaving `planar` to *actually* refer to types storing
multiple planes worth of pixels. These types are showing up more and
more, and deserve something better than their previous long-winded and
misleading name.
Part of P0081, funded by Ember2528.
No need to declare most of these in C land if 1) it isn't even clear
yet whether we can even decompile these functions with their 2)
complex __usercall conventions, which 3) aren't even called from
outside this slice. --Nmlgc
nmlgc