Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
nmlgc 5bffab4f43 [Position independence] [th04/th05] Remaining references to PI slots
Part of P0060, funded by Touhou Patch Center.
2019-11-28 23:23:30 +01:00
nmlgc 92979e8f31 [C decompilation] [th02] Code segment #2 of all three executables
Only one code segment left in both OP and FUUIN! its-happening.gif

Yeah, that commit is way larger than I'm comfortable with, but none of these
functions is particularly large or difficult to decompile (with the exception
of graph_putsa_fx(), which I actually did weeks ago), and OP and MAIN have
their own unique functions in between the shared ones, so…
2015-03-14 23:25:50 +01:00
nmlgc a3ae0095f0 [C decompilation] [th02] PI display 2015-03-04 04:28:16 +01:00
nmlgc 63299cdf42 [C decompilation] [th02/op] High score screen 2015-03-03 04:25:19 +01:00
nmlgc 87b1fb9e14 [C decompilation] [th02/maine] High score screen
MAIN.EXE shares most of the code in this segment, but I can't remove it from
there right now due to the weird ordering of the data segments in that
executable…

And yes, once again, those three seemingly random type casts in here are
*necessary* to build a bit-perfect binary.
2015-03-02 06:30:06 +01:00
nmlgc 6d8ff6b72e Make previously reduced ZUN functions available to C 2015-02-21 14:12:22 +01:00
nmlgc a07e5fad42 [Reverse-engineering] Slot-based PI display
Also covering the two variations for blitting only every second row or
blitting only a 320x200 quarter, as seen in the endings.

So yeah, there's indeed nothing wrong with piread.cpp. TH03 just uses that
separate function that only blits every second row of an image, and indeed
always loads the entire image as it would appear in a PNG conversion. Here's
what happens if you display these images using the non-interlacing function:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/885krj09d9l0890/th03%20PI%20no%20interlace.png
2014-12-18 14:36:43 +01:00
nmlgc bead27b781 Use TASM calling convention syntax for previously identified ZUN functions
With TH03 changing the calling convention for most of the code from __cdecl to
__pascal, I've been getting more and more confused about this myself. So,
let's settle on the following consistent syntax for function calls:

* C where the calling convention is actually __cdecl and where TASM's emitted
  __cdecl code matches the original binary
* PASCAL where the calling convention is actually __pascal
* STDCALL where the calling convention is actually __cdecl, but where
  the caller either defers stack cleanup (summing up the stack size of
  multiple functions, then cleaning it all in a single "add sp" instruction)
  or where the stack is cleared in a different way (e.g. "pop cx").

Unfortunately though, when using the ARG directive to automatically generate
an appropriate RET instruction for the given calling convention, TASM always
emits ENTER and LEAVE instructions even when no local variables are declared,
which greatly limits the number of functions where we can use that syntax. -.-
2014-12-16 05:53:56 +01:00
nmlgc 510a3a5070 [Reverse-engineering] pi_slot_palette_apply 2014-11-22 09:29:09 +01:00
nmlgc b532a96c7e [JWasm move] Avoid "push large"
For 32-bit immediate values, PUSH by itself is enough. For everything else,
PUSHD works in both TASM and JWasm.

Also, could it be...? Could we actually move to JWasm without breaking the
build in TASM at all?
2014-11-19 12:09:22 +01:00
nmlgc f54b85577d [Reverse-engineering] Slot-based PI file loading and freeing 2014-11-18 17:56:13 +01:00
nmlgc b4361e8487 [Reduction] #700-704: pfopen
... and then I end up copying modified versions into the individual game
subdirectories after all, because the changes between games were simply too
drastic. (That's also why I'm counting pfopen() itself twice.)

Only one slice left now, and then we're done with reduction!
2014-11-17 04:54:40 +01:00