With TH05 definitely being the Galaxy Brain version of this function.
You'll see once I get to push the C decompilation for that one…
Anyway, that covers all shared input functions of TH02-TH05!
Funded by zorg.
Comparing with uth05win, I renamed some
label so that easy to see.
I should not test whether there is grammer error.
So if you find some grammer error, please notice me.
In which ZUN actively refuses help from master.lib and rips out
everything that isn't immediately related to reading the one joystick
port of the PC-9801-86 sound board.
Maybe there actually was a good reason for that?
Funded by -Tom-.
Look at that TH05 vector2_at_opt function. What the hell, the caller is
supposed to set up the stack frame for the function? How do you even get
a compiler to do this (and no, I haven't found a compiler switch)? No
way around writing a separate "optimizer" as part of the compilation
pipeline, it seems.
OK, let's not identify the arrays in a file-based fashion just yet, and
first reduce all shared ZUN code that uses arrays. Less stressful, we'll
have to do this anyway, and I just can't resist the urge to immediately
reverse-engineer everything I find.
Oh, right, these functions can have parameters. So, let's turn snd_kaja_func()
into a macro that combines the function number and the parameter into the AX
value for the driver.
And renaming them all to the short filenames they will be decompiled to for
consistency. These functions aren't really immediately hardware-related, as
we've established earlier in the decompilation.
Yes, all of it. Including the bouncing polygons, of course. And since it's
placed at the end of ZUN's code inside the executable, the code's already
position-independent and fully hackable.
Well, duh, of course, we *can* do this in order to allow decompilation to be
started at the end (not the beginning) of any segment. In fact, if we hadn't
done this, we would have had to start by moving _TEXT out to libraries....
After spending a few hours on correctly decompiling ZUN's bulky custom text
renderer used in TH02 and TH03, it unfortunately turned out that TLINK doesn't
actually give us the fine-grained control over segment ordering we'd like to
have in a project like this, and that we can't slot code from one object file
in between segments from another object file. This means that yes, we really
have to decompile the functions in the order they appear in the executables,
starting on either end.
So, have a boring janitorial commit instead.
This took long enough, so we're not covering the COM files right now. Like, I
can't even tell how you're supposed to work around the forced word alignment
for the _TEXT segment. Guess we'll just have to decompile all of these in one
go, just like we did with ZUNSOFT.COM.
Also, it really seems as if we're merely trading one ugly workaround for
another in our quest for identical binaries.
I've looked at every openly available piece of PC-98 documentation, and there
don't seem to be any official names for the individual planes. The closest
thing I could find was the description at
http://island.geocities.jp/cklouch/column/pc98bas/pc98disphw2.htm
explaining that they represent the blue, red, green, and brightness component
when using the default PC-98 palette. However, these planes correspond to
nothing else but the 4 individual bits of the final index into the color
palette, and you can assign any color to every single palette slot. Therefore,
it's merely a convention that your own palettes don't have to follow (and in
Touhou, they don't).
Nevertheless, there doesn't seem to be an alternative, and the Neko Project II
source code uses the same B/R/G/E convention, so I'll go with that as well.
Also covering the two variations for blitting only every second row or
blitting only a 320x200 quarter, as seen in the endings.
So yeah, there's indeed nothing wrong with piread.cpp. TH03 just uses that
separate function that only blits every second row of an image, and indeed
always loads the entire image as it would appear in a PNG conversion. Here's
what happens if you display these images using the non-interlacing function:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/885krj09d9l0890/th03%20PI%20no%20interlace.png
With TH03 changing the calling convention for most of the code from __cdecl to
__pascal, I've been getting more and more confused about this myself. So,
let's settle on the following consistent syntax for function calls:
* C where the calling convention is actually __cdecl and where TASM's emitted
__cdecl code matches the original binary
* PASCAL where the calling convention is actually __pascal
* STDCALL where the calling convention is actually __cdecl, but where
the caller either defers stack cleanup (summing up the stack size of
multiple functions, then cleaning it all in a single "add sp" instruction)
or where the stack is cleared in a different way (e.g. "pop cx").
Unfortunately though, when using the ARG directive to automatically generate
an appropriate RET instruction for the given calling convention, TASM always
emits ENTER and LEAVE instructions even when no local variables are declared,
which greatly limits the number of functions where we can use that syntax. -.-
Note how it's only one *mode* in TH02/TH03, but two *modes* in TH04/TH05,
since you can't select between FM and Beep sound effect modes in TH02/TH03 (or
even disable sounds altogether). Might be a bit confusing, but it seemed
appropriate enough to distinguish the two functions.
Well, the naming.
Even though only TH02 actually uses MIDI (and thus, the MMD driver), every
game since then contains interrupt instructions for both functions. We could
just name it "pmd", since it seems like that's what came first - the AH
numbers of the 6 functions that make up MMD's interrupt API are identical to
those of the equivalent functions in PMD, even including gaps in the numbering
for PMD functions that don't have an equivalent in MIDI. However, except for
the FM sound effect handling and the key display in TH05's Music Room, these 6
functions are all the games actually use. Also, we already distinguish between
PMD and MMD in the driver check functions, and it might be confusing to only
imply PMD from now on?
So, "kaja" it is, collectively referring to the shared aspects of both
drivers.
For 32-bit immediate values, PUSH by itself is enough. For everything else,
PUSHD works in both TASM and JWasm.
Also, could it be...? Could we actually move to JWasm without breaking the
build in TASM at all?
... and then I end up copying modified versions into the individual game
subdirectories after all, because the changes between games were simply too
drastic. (That's also why I'm counting pfopen() itself twice.)
Only one slice left now, and then we're done with reduction!
Yup, packfiles finally proved that we really have a different set of changes
to master.lib in every game. Also, there are bound to be more of these game-
specific small changes to otherwise identical code in ZUN's own code.
And hey, no need to define that value in the build scripts anymore.
(I've also considered just copying modified versions into the individual game
subdirectories, but it's not too nice to expect people to diff them in order
to actually understand why these copies exist and where the changes actually
are.)
> introduce a new macro to halve the lines of a far function pointer
assignment, hoping that this commit will end up deleting more lines than it
adds, because TH03 has lots of those
> oh wait, these games mainly use near function pointers
> unearth even more new functions in the process
Seriously, how many more functions are still hidden in this codebase? And all
that just because IDA was not smart enough to begin with.
nmlgc
