Whoops, turns out that the build has been broken on TASM32 version 5.3
(the one in the DevKit) ever since 7897bf1. In contrast to version 5.0
(which I use for my development), 5.3 actually defines 32-bit segments
if you specify a .386 CPU before using .MODEL.
That might have been the reason for the .286 workaround all along?
Turns out there's the USE16 modifier, which makes this much more
explicit than switching CPUs.
`cPtrSize` is simply the wrong constant for calculating parameter
offsets on the stack, because it corresponds to the memory model's
default distance, not the function's distance. Luckily, ARG has a
RETURNS clause, and if you declare all parameters in there, ARG won't
emit that pesky and unnecessary `ENTER 0, 0` instruction. Big discovery
right there!
Sadly, ARG is unusable for ZUN's silly functions that keep the base
pointer in BX. TASM declares the resulting equates as `[BP+offset]`,
and it's apparently impossible to only get `offset` out of such an
equate later.
So, rather than staying with numbers, let's reimplement ARG for these
functions instead. This way, we can even abstract away the stack clear
size for the `RET` instructions.
It's a bit rough around the edges though, forcing you to explicitly
specify the function distance, and to pass the parameters in reverse
order compared to the C declaration (thankfully, all of these use the
PASCAL calling convention). It also doesn't work with more complex
types yet. But certainly better than numbers.
Part of P0134, funded by [Anonymous].
Undecompilable again. The loading functions have these *_noalpha()
variants that simply set a global variable and fall through to the
regular functions, while cdg_free() has its first `PUSH DI` instruction
after the first expression we'd be decompiling. cdg_free_all() *could*
be decompiled… but would also require _FLAGS trickery, and it's simply
not worth starting a translation unit for one such small function.
Part of P0127, funded by [Anonymous].
No need to make the function names more complicated if we already
expressed the one subtle format difference between TH03 and TH04/TH05
in the plane layout enum.
Part of P0113, funded by Lmocinemod.
No leading underscore for functions with Pascal calling convention, but
we do have one for all variables, because it's not worth it to put
keywords in front of everything for no reason.
Seemed to have forgotten this rule in 2017?
Part of P0030, funded by zorg.
nmlgc