mirror of https://github.com/explosion/spaCy.git
parent
376c5813a7
commit
2b07ab7db4
|
@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
|
|||
"GoldParse": "goldparse"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Other": {
|
||||
"Annotation Specs": "annotation"
|
||||
"Annotation Specs": "annotation",
|
||||
"Feature Scheme": "features"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -111,5 +112,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
"annotation": {
|
||||
"title": "Annotation Specifications"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"features": {
|
||||
"title": "Linear Model Feature Scheme"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
|
|||
//- 💫 DOCS > API > LINEAR MOEL FEATURES
|
||||
|
||||
include ../../_includes/_mixins
|
||||
|
||||
p
|
||||
| There are two popular strategies for putting together machine learning
|
||||
| models for NLP: sparse linear models, and neural networks. To solve NLP
|
||||
| problems with linear models, feature templates need to be assembled that
|
||||
| combine multiple atomic predictors. This page documents the atomic
|
||||
| predictors used in the spaCy 1.0 #[+api("parser") #[code Parser]],
|
||||
| #[+api("tagger") #[code Tagger]] and
|
||||
| #[+api("entityrecognizer") #[code EntityRecognizer]].
|
||||
|
||||
p
|
||||
| To understand the scheme, recall that spaCy's #[code Parser] and
|
||||
| #[code EntityRecognizer] are implemented as push-down automata. They
|
||||
| maintain a "stack" that holds the current entity, and a "buffer"
|
||||
| consisting of the words to be processed.
|
||||
|
||||
p
|
||||
| Each state consists of the words on the stack (if any), which consistute
|
||||
| the current entity being constructed. We also have the current word, and
|
||||
| the two subsequent words. Finally, we also have the entities previously
|
||||
| built.
|
||||
|
||||
p
|
||||
| This gives us a number of tokens to ask questions about, to make the
|
||||
| features. About each of these tokens, we can ask about a number of
|
||||
| different properties. Each feature identifier asks about a specific
|
||||
| property of a specific token of the context.
|
||||
|
||||
+h(2, "tokens") Context tokens
|
||||
|
||||
+table([ "ID", "Description" ])
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code S0]
|
||||
+cell
|
||||
| The first word on the stack, i.e. the token most recently added
|
||||
| to the current entity.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code S1]
|
||||
+cell The second word on the stack, i.e. the second most recently added.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code S2]
|
||||
+cell The third word on the stack, i.e. the third most recently added.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0]
|
||||
+cell The first word of the buffer, i.e. the current word being tagged.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N1]
|
||||
+cell The second word of the buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N2]
|
||||
+cell The third word of the buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code P1]
|
||||
+cell The word immediately before #[code N0].
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code P2]
|
||||
+cell The second word before #[code N0].
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code E0]
|
||||
+cell The first word of the previously constructed entity.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code E1]
|
||||
+cell The first word of the second previously constructed entity.
|
||||
|
||||
p About each of these tokens, we can ask:
|
||||
|
||||
+table([ "ID", "Attribute", "Description" ])
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0w]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.orth]
|
||||
+cell The word form.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0W]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.lemma]
|
||||
+cell The word's lemma.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0p]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.tag]
|
||||
+cell The word's (full) POS tag.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0c]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.cluster]
|
||||
+cell The word's (full) Brown cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0c4]
|
||||
+cell -
|
||||
+cell First four digit prefix of the word's Brown cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0c6]
|
||||
+cell -
|
||||
+cell First six digit prefix of the word's Brown cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0L]
|
||||
+cell -
|
||||
+cell The word's dependency label. Not used as a feature in the NER.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0_prefix]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.prefix]
|
||||
+cell The first three characters of the word.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0_suffix]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.suffix]
|
||||
+cell The last three characters of the word.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0_shape]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.shape]
|
||||
+cell The word's shape, i.e. is it alphabetic, numeric, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0_ne_iob]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.ent_iob]
|
||||
+cell The Inside/Outside/Begin code of the word's NER tag.
|
||||
|
||||
+row
|
||||
+cell #[code N0_ne_type]
|
||||
+cell #[code token.ent_type]
|
||||
+cell The word's NER type.
|
|
@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ p
|
|||
| recognizer, with weights learned using the
|
||||
| #[+a("https://explosion.ai/blog/part-of-speech-pos-tagger-in-python") Averaged Perceptron algorithm].
|
||||
|
||||
+aside("Linear Model Feature Scheme")
|
||||
| For a list of the available feature atoms, see the #[+a("/docs/api/features") Linear Model Feature Scheme].
|
||||
|
||||
p
|
||||
| Because it's a linear model, it's important for accuracy to build
|
||||
| conjunction features out of the atomic predictors. Let's say you have
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue