Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f71f0ce29
commit
49b2424e6e
12
README.md
12
README.md
|
@ -118,7 +118,15 @@ The rest of the code is automated by the [Trainer](https://pytorch-lightning.rea
|
|||
## Testing Rigour
|
||||
All the automated code by the Trainer is [tested rigorously with every new PR](https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/tree/master/tests).
|
||||
|
||||
In fact, we also train a few models using a vanilla PyTorch loop and compare with the same model trained using the Trainer to make sure we achieve the EXACT same results. [Check out the parity tests here](https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/tree/master/benchmarks).
|
||||
For every PR we test all combinations of:
|
||||
- PyTorch 1.3, 1.4, 1.5
|
||||
- Python 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
|
||||
- Linux, OSX, Windows
|
||||
- Multiple GPUs
|
||||
|
||||
**How does performance compare with vanilla PyTorch?**
|
||||
We have tests to ensure we get the EXACT same results in under 600 ms difference per epoch. In reality, lightning adds about a 300 ms overhead per epoch.
|
||||
[Check out the parity tests here](https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/tree/master/benchmarks).
|
||||
|
||||
Overall, Lightning guarantees rigorously tested, correct, modern best practices for the automated parts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -329,7 +337,7 @@ Lightning has out-of-the-box integration with the popular logging/visualizing fr
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
## Running speed
|
||||
Migrating to lightning does not mean compromising on speed! You can expect an overhead of about 600 ms per epoch comparing to pure PyTorch.
|
||||
Migrating to lightning does not mean compromising on speed! You can expect an overhead of about 300 ms per epoch compared with pure PyTorch.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue