From 2a54c27e1cde25599a566db9d86ccdd1acbbca65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: fruitbat Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:50:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: tweaked licence wording in sources/guide/licensing.rst --- doc/sources/guide/licensing.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/sources/guide/licensing.rst b/doc/sources/guide/licensing.rst index 1635e91ba..51a70c2d2 100644 --- a/doc/sources/guide/licensing.rst +++ b/doc/sources/guide/licensing.rst @@ -145,15 +145,15 @@ Avoiding binaries .. |cons| replace:: consequences .. _cons: http://programmers.stackexchange.com/a/234295 -There might be a way how to avoid this licensing process with avoiding creating +There might be a way how to avoid this licensing process by avoiding creating a distribution with third-party stuff completely. With Python you can create a module, which is only your code with ``__main__.py`` + ``setup.py`` that only -lists required deps. +lists required depencies. -This way you can still distribute your app - your *code* - and you might not +This way, you can still distribute your app - your *code* - and you might not need to care about other licenses. The combination of your code and the dependencies could be specified as a "usage" rather than a "distribution". The responsibility of satisfying licenses, however, most likely transfers to your user, who needs to assemble the environment to even run the module. If you care -about your users, you might want to slow down a little and read more about +about your users, you might want to slow down a little and read more about the |cons|_.