From acee48628d6df976170c289227def0644cf2dbf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 08:15:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Repair failing test_sre.py. This was a funny one! The test very subtly relied on 1.5.2's behavior of treating "\x%" as "\x%", i.e. ignoring that was an \x escape that didn't make sense. But /F implemented PEP 223, which causes 2.0 to raise an exception on the bad escape. Fixed by merely making the 3 such strings of this kind into raw strings. --- Lib/test/test_sre.py | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_sre.py b/Lib/test/test_sre.py index 1eea12fee82..5c56a28e83e 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_sre.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_sre.py @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ def test(expression, result, exception=None): test(r"""sre.match("\%03o" % i, chr(i)) != None""", 1) test(r"""sre.match("\%03o0" % i, chr(i)+"0") != None""", 1) test(r"""sre.match("\%03o8" % i, chr(i)+"8") != None""", 1) - test(r"""sre.match("\x%02x" % i, chr(i)) != None""", 1) - test(r"""sre.match("\x%02x0" % i, chr(i)+"0") != None""", 1) - test(r"""sre.match("\x%02xz" % i, chr(i)+"z") != None""", 1) + test(r"""sre.match(r"\x%02x" % i, chr(i)) != None""", 1) + test(r"""sre.match(r"\x%02x0" % i, chr(i)+"0") != None""", 1) + test(r"""sre.match(r"\x%02xz" % i, chr(i)+"z") != None""", 1) test(r"""sre.match("\911", "")""", None, sre.error) #