mirror of https://github.com/BOINC/boinc.git
boinccitizen-sciencec-plus-plusdistributed-computinggrid-computinghacktoberfesthigh-performance-computinghigh-throughput-computingphpsciencescientific-computingvolunteer-computing
dd0ff1ac2b
actually not impossible. Consider the following scenario: WU A has result 1 and WU B has result 2. These are both sent to a host. Some time later, result 1 fails and the transitioner creates a new result, result 3 for WU A. Then the host requests a new result. The maximum result already sent to the host is 2. The next unsent result (sorted by ID) is #3. But since it is for WU A, and since the host has already gotten a result for WU A, it's infeasible. So I think this is only wacky if !one_wu_per_result_per_host. - David, I simplified the inner part of send_results_for_file() somewhat. I can't see the need/use for the bool bool in_working_set argument. If I have really screwed the pooch please revert. svn path=/trunk/boinc/; revision=5106 |
||
---|---|---|
api | ||
apps | ||
client | ||
clientgui | ||
db | ||
doc | ||
html | ||
lib | ||
m4 | ||
mac_build | ||
py | ||
sched | ||
sea | ||
stripchart | ||
test | ||
tools | ||
win_build | ||
zip | ||
.cvsignore | ||
.vimrc | ||
INSTALL | ||
Makefile.am | ||
Makefile.incl | ||
TODO_OLD | ||
_autosetup | ||
bl | ||
checkin_notes | ||
compile | ||
config.guess | ||
config.sub | ||
configure.ac | ||
depcomp | ||
find-working-cvs | ||
fix-repository-20040202 | ||
install-sh | ||
missing | ||
mkinstalldirs | ||
nightly-tarball | ||
notes | ||
set-version | ||
testbase | ||
todo | ||
version.h | ||
version.h.in |