109 lines
4.8 KiB
ReStructuredText
109 lines
4.8 KiB
ReStructuredText
Type Annotations
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
``attrs`` comes with first class support for type annotations for both Python 3.6 (:pep:`526`) and legacy syntax.
|
|
|
|
However they will forever remain *optional*, therefore the example from the README could also be written as:
|
|
|
|
.. doctest::
|
|
|
|
>>> from attrs import define, field
|
|
|
|
>>> @define
|
|
... class SomeClass:
|
|
... a_number = field(default=42)
|
|
... list_of_numbers = field(factory=list)
|
|
|
|
>>> sc = SomeClass(1, [1, 2, 3])
|
|
>>> sc
|
|
SomeClass(a_number=1, list_of_numbers=[1, 2, 3])
|
|
|
|
You can choose freely between the approaches, but please remember that if you choose to use type annotations, you **must** annotate **all** attributes!
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
Even when going all-in on type annotations, you will need `attr.field` for some advanced features though.
|
|
|
|
One of those features are the decorator-based features like defaults.
|
|
It's important to remember that ``attrs`` doesn't do any magic behind your back.
|
|
All the decorators are implemented using an object that is returned by the call to `attrs.field`.
|
|
|
|
Attributes that only carry a class annotation do not have that object so trying to call a method on it will inevitably fail.
|
|
|
|
*****
|
|
|
|
Please note that types -- however added -- are *only metadata* that can be queried from the class and they aren't used for anything out of the box!
|
|
|
|
Because Python does not allow references to a class object before the class is defined,
|
|
types may be defined as string literals, so-called *forward references* (:pep:`526`).
|
|
You can enable this automatically for a whole module by using ``from __future__ import annotations`` (:pep:`563`) as of Python 3.7.
|
|
In this case ``attrs`` simply puts these string literals into the ``type`` attributes.
|
|
If you need to resolve these to real types, you can call `attrs.resolve_types` which will update the attribute in place.
|
|
|
|
In practice though, types show their biggest usefulness in combination with tools like mypy_, pytype_, or pyright_ that have dedicated support for ``attrs`` classes.
|
|
|
|
The addition of static types is certainly one of the most exciting features in the Python ecosystem and helps you write *correct* and *verified self-documenting* code.
|
|
|
|
If you don't know where to start, Carl Meyer gave a great talk on `Type-checked Python in the Real World <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMgmKJyWKn8>`_ at PyCon US 2018 that will help you to get started in no time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mypy
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
While having a nice syntax for type metadata is great, it's even greater that mypy_ as of 0.570 ships with a dedicated ``attrs`` plugin which allows you to statically check your code.
|
|
|
|
Imagine you add another line that tries to instantiate the defined class using ``SomeClass("23")``.
|
|
Mypy will catch that error for you:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: console
|
|
|
|
$ mypy t.py
|
|
t.py:12: error: Argument 1 to "SomeClass" has incompatible type "str"; expected "int"
|
|
|
|
This happens *without* running your code!
|
|
|
|
And it also works with *both* Python 2-style annotation styles.
|
|
To mypy, this code is equivalent to the one above:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
|
@attr.s
|
|
class SomeClass(object):
|
|
a_number = attr.ib(default=42) # type: int
|
|
list_of_numbers = attr.ib(factory=list, type=list[int])
|
|
|
|
|
|
pyright
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
``attrs`` provides support for pyright_ though the dataclass_transform_ specification.
|
|
This provides static type inference for a subset of ``attrs`` equivalent to standard-library ``dataclasses``,
|
|
and requires explicit type annotations using the `attrs.define` or ``@attr.s(auto_attribs=True)`` API.
|
|
|
|
Given the following definition, ``pyright`` will generate static type signatures for ``SomeClass`` attribute access, ``__init__``, ``__eq__``, and comparison methods::
|
|
|
|
@attr.define
|
|
class SomeClass:
|
|
a_number: int = 42
|
|
list_of_numbers: list[int] = attr.field(factory=list)
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
The ``pyright`` inferred types are a subset of those supported by ``mypy``, including:
|
|
|
|
- The generated ``__init__`` signature only includes the attribute type annotations.
|
|
It currently does not include attribute ``converter`` types.
|
|
|
|
- The ``attr.frozen`` decorator is not typed with frozen attributes, which are properly typed via ``attr.define(frozen=True)``.
|
|
|
|
A `full list <https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/dataclass_transforms.md#attrs>`_ of limitations and incompatibilities can be found in pyright's repository.
|
|
|
|
Your constructive feedback is welcome in both `attrs#795 <https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/issues/795>`_ and `pyright#1782 <https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/discussions/1782>`_.
|
|
Generally speaking, the decision on improving ``attrs`` support in pyright is entirely Microsoft's prerogative though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _mypy: http://mypy-lang.org
|
|
.. _pytype: https://google.github.io/pytype/
|
|
.. _pyright: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright
|
|
.. _dataclass_transform: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/dataclass_transforms.md
|