(how)= # How Does It Work? ## Boilerplate *attrs* isn't the first library that aims to simplify class definition in Python. But its **declarative** approach combined with **no runtime overhead** lets it stand out. Once you apply the `@attrs.define` (or `@attr.s`) decorator to a class, *attrs* searches the class object for instances of `attr.ib`s. Internally they're a representation of the data passed into `attr.ib` along with a counter to preserve the order of the attributes. Alternatively, it's possible to define them using {doc}`types`. In order to ensure that subclassing works as you'd expect it to work, *attrs* also walks the class hierarchy and collects the attributes of all base classes. Please note that *attrs* does *not* call `super()` *ever*. It will write {term}`dunder methods` to work on *all* of those attributes which also has performance benefits due to fewer function calls. Once *attrs* knows what attributes it has to work on, it writes the requested {term}`dunder methods` and -- depending on whether you wish to have a {term}`dict ` or {term}`slotted ` class -- creates a new class for you (`slots=True`) or attaches them to the original class (`slots=False`). While creating new classes is more elegant, we've run into several edge cases surrounding metaclasses that make it impossible to go this route unconditionally. To be very clear: if you define a class with a single attribute without a default value, the generated `__init__` will look *exactly* how you'd expect: ```{doctest} >>> import inspect >>> from attrs import define >>> @define ... class C: ... x: int >>> print(inspect.getsource(C.__init__)) def __init__(self, x): self.x = x ``` No magic, no meta programming, no expensive introspection at runtime. --- Everything until this point happens exactly *once* when the class is defined. As soon as a class is done, it's done. And it's just a regular Python class like any other, except for a single `__attrs_attrs__` attribute that *attrs* uses internally. Much of the information is accessible via {func}`attrs.fields` and other functions which can be used for introspection or for writing your own tools and decorators on top of *attrs* (like {func}`attrs.asdict`). And once you start instantiating your classes, *attrs* is out of your way completely. This **static** approach was very much a design goal of *attrs* and what I strongly believe makes it distinct. (how-frozen)= ## Immutability In order to give you immutability, *attrs* will attach a `__setattr__` method to your class that raises an {class}`attrs.exceptions.FrozenInstanceError` whenever anyone tries to set an attribute. The same is true if you choose to freeze individual attributes using the {obj}`attrs.setters.frozen` *on_setattr* hook -- except that the exception becomes {class}`attrs.exceptions.FrozenAttributeError`. Both exceptions subclass {class}`attrs.exceptions.FrozenError`. --- Depending on whether a class is a dict class or a slotted class, *attrs* uses a different technique to circumvent that limitation in the `__init__` method. Once constructed, frozen instances don't differ in any way from regular ones except that you cannot change its attributes. ### Dict Classes Dict classes -- that is: regular classes -- simply assign the value directly into the class' eponymous `__dict__` (and there's nothing we can do to stop the user to do the same). The performance impact is negligible. ### Slotted Classes Slotted classes are more complicated. Here it uses (an aggressively cached) {meth}`object.__setattr__` to set your attributes. This is (still) slower than a plain assignment: ```none $ pyperf timeit --rigorous \ -s "import attr; C = attr.make_class('C', ['x', 'y', 'z'], slots=True)" \ "C(1, 2, 3)" ......................................... Mean +- std dev: 228 ns +- 18 ns $ pyperf timeit --rigorous \ -s "import attr; C = attr.make_class('C', ['x', 'y', 'z'], slots=True, frozen=True)" \ "C(1, 2, 3)" ......................................... Mean +- std dev: 425 ns +- 16 ns ``` So on a laptop computer the difference is about 200 nanoseconds (1 second is 1,000,000,000 nanoseconds). It's certainly something you'll feel in a hot loop but shouldn't matter in normal code. Pick what's more important to you. ### Summary You should avoid instantiating lots of frozen slotted classes (meaning: `@frozen`) in performance-critical code. Frozen dict classes have barely a performance impact, unfrozen slotted classes are even *faster* than unfrozen dict classes (meaning: regular classes). (how-slotted-cached_property)= ## Cached Properties on Slotted Classes By default, the standard library {func}`functools.cached_property` decorator does not work on slotted classes, because it requires a `__dict__` to store the cached value. This could be surprising when using *attrs*, as slotted classes are the default. Therefore, *attrs* converts `cached_property`-decorated methods when constructing slotted classes. Getting this working is achieved by: * Adding names to `__slots__` for the wrapped methods. * Adding a `__getattr__` method to set values on the wrapped methods. For most users, this should mean that it works transparently. :::{note} The implementation does not guarantee that the wrapped method is called only once in multi-threaded usage. This matches the implementation of `cached_property` in Python 3.12. :::