Type Annotations ================ ``attrs`` comes with first class support for type annotations for both Python 3.6 (:pep:`526`) and legacy syntax. However they will forever remain *optional*, therefore the example from the README could also be written as: .. doctest:: >>> from attrs import define, field >>> @define ... class SomeClass: ... a_number = field(default=42) ... list_of_numbers = field(factory=list) >>> sc = SomeClass(1, [1, 2, 3]) >>> sc SomeClass(a_number=1, list_of_numbers=[1, 2, 3]) You can choose freely between the approaches, but please remember that if you choose to use type annotations, you **must** annotate **all** attributes! ---- Even when going all-in on type annotations, you will need `attr.field` for some advanced features though. One of those features are the decorator-based features like defaults. It's important to remember that ``attrs`` doesn't do any magic behind your back. All the decorators are implemented using an object that is returned by the call to `attrs.field`. Attributes that only carry a class annotation do not have that object so trying to call a method on it will inevitably fail. ***** Please note that types -- however added -- are *only metadata* that can be queried from the class and they aren't used for anything out of the box! Because Python does not allow references to a class object before the class is defined, types may be defined as string literals, so-called *forward references* (:pep:`526`). You can enable this automatically for a whole module by using ``from __future__ import annotations`` (:pep:`563`) as of Python 3.7. In this case ``attrs`` simply puts these string literals into the ``type`` attributes. If you need to resolve these to real types, you can call `attrs.resolve_types` which will update the attribute in place. In practice though, types show their biggest usefulness in combination with tools like mypy_, pytype_, or pyright_ that have dedicated support for ``attrs`` classes. The addition of static types is certainly one of the most exciting features in the Python ecosystem and helps you write *correct* and *verified self-documenting* code. If you don't know where to start, Carl Meyer gave a great talk on `Type-checked Python in the Real World `_ at PyCon US 2018 that will help you to get started in no time. mypy ---- While having a nice syntax for type metadata is great, it's even greater that mypy_ as of 0.570 ships with a dedicated ``attrs`` plugin which allows you to statically check your code. Imagine you add another line that tries to instantiate the defined class using ``SomeClass("23")``. Mypy will catch that error for you: .. code-block:: console $ mypy t.py t.py:12: error: Argument 1 to "SomeClass" has incompatible type "str"; expected "int" This happens *without* running your code! And it also works with *both* Python 2-style annotation styles. To mypy, this code is equivalent to the one above: .. code-block:: python @attr.s class SomeClass: a_number = attr.ib(default=42) # type: int list_of_numbers = attr.ib(factory=list, type=list[int]) pyright ------- ``attrs`` provides support for pyright_ though the dataclass_transform_ specification. This provides static type inference for a subset of ``attrs`` equivalent to standard-library ``dataclasses``, and requires explicit type annotations using the `attrs.define` or ``@attr.s(auto_attribs=True)`` API. Given the following definition, ``pyright`` will generate static type signatures for ``SomeClass`` attribute access, ``__init__``, ``__eq__``, and comparison methods:: @attr.define class SomeClass: a_number: int = 42 list_of_numbers: list[int] = attr.field(factory=list) .. warning:: The ``pyright`` inferred types are a subset of those supported by ``mypy``, including: - The generated ``__init__`` signature only includes the attribute type annotations. It currently does not include attribute ``converter`` types. - The ``attr.frozen`` decorator is not typed with frozen attributes, which are properly typed via ``attr.define(frozen=True)``. A `full list `_ of limitations and incompatibilities can be found in pyright's repository. Your constructive feedback is welcome in both `attrs#795 `_ and `pyright#1782 `_. Generally speaking, the decision on improving ``attrs`` support in pyright is entirely Microsoft's prerogative though. .. _mypy: http://mypy-lang.org .. _pytype: https://google.github.io/pytype/ .. _pyright: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright .. _dataclass_transform: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/dataclass_transforms.md